Terminology: My approach to arriving at the CJ Interpretation of Roguelike:


Part 1, part 2

“We need a different name from ‘permadeath,’” Rogue co-creator Glenn Wichman said. “When people talk about permadeath, they talk about us three being mean. ‘Oh, they wanted to make it extra hard, so they threw in permadeath.’ [But] permadeath is [just] an example of ‘consequence persistence’.”


While looking for references for these posts I found the above phrase, and it exemplifies a core concept of my interpretation of roguelikes: To focus on the higher principles and on the experiences the mechanics enable rather than focusing on the mechanics themselves.

For example


I consider my current project “Lenurian”, to be a realtime roguelike. I understand that not everyone will agree, because to many people the turn based nature is integral to the experience. I realized that what I liked most in turn based games(including roguelikes) was the way it enabled Tactical complexity: combat/exploration focused on Positioning, situational awareness, carefull thinking, etc…, so to me those things are what gives the roguelike feel, and turn base gameplay is just one possible way to enable those things. To other people the important thing is the turn based gameplay and the things I like are secondary. However, It is perfectly possible to create a roguelike that perfectly complies with the Temple of the roguelike´s Classic Roguelike Definition but make it so simple and straightforward, that the player will never have many options to consider and there will be no tactical complexity.

What If we have a roguelike with a timer for your actions (like a chess clock)? it is mechanically very close to a traditional roguelike(And indeed would be considered a roguelike by many definitions ), but that feeling of time-control  that enables a rogueliker to carefully weight every possible decision vanishes. In comparison, a real time game that allows one to creep around, observe the environment and it´s denizens, plan according to what was observed and only then act(Maybe something like hitman on a dungeon?) Would feel closer to that feeling, despite being real time(Anyway, that is my thesis will see If I can make it work when/if the Lenurian is ready)

Another example is ASCII graphics. To some people they are integral to the experience similar to how some people prefer books without illustrations in order to have their imaginations do all the work, to others, gameplay is more important and aesthetics is barely relevant. In my case, graphics that show extra information, like equipment/weapons/class of the characters/monster enhances the roguelike feel, because the graphics remain clear and unambiguous but gives me more information to consider tactically ,helping me engage with the aforementioned tactical complexity aspect of the game, and to engage with other subsystems ( e.g.: the inventory systems).

On the other hand, many people(including all of those that use the berlin interpretation) consider
the fact the player and non-player characters follow the same rules, to be  a relatively unimportant aspect of a roguelike, but to me it is absolutely essential, this sort of consistence is something that stands at the core of my appreciation of roguelikes, and roguelikes that don´t have that don´t really interest me.


Tags: ,

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. The CJ Interpretation of Roguelike | CJ´s Cave - September 3, 2017

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: